In a guest column in today's Wall Street Journal, Karl Rove points out the economic ignorance of both candidates. He is a very clever man. Just once, I'd like to hear an economic proposal from a candidate that wasn't fundamentally flawed.
And it is not alright if they do not actually intend to implement the stupid proposal. If that is the case then the candidate is pandering to the idiots among us, which is a bad idea. And is lying to all of us. I know I am an idealist, but I would rather not have to decide between candidates on the basis of which one is the better and more skilled liar.